{"id":3571,"date":"2016-08-03T10:30:53","date_gmt":"2016-08-03T05:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/?p=3571"},"modified":"2016-08-02T17:14:39","modified_gmt":"2016-08-02T11:44:39","slug":"there-is-a-moral-case-for-abortion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/there-is-a-moral-case-for-abortion\/","title":{"rendered":"There is a Moral Case for Abortion- A new book A new perspective!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" data-attachment-id=\"3572\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/there-is-a-moral-case-for-abortion\/ann\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Ann.jpg\" data-orig-size=\"153,216\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"Ann\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-medium-file=\"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Ann.jpg\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Ann.jpg\" src=\"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Ann.jpg\" alt=\"Ann\" width=\"153\" height=\"216\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-3572\" \/><em>&#8220;Access to abortion is an integral part of women\u2019s reproductive health care and women have the ethical right to receive this along with other supportive services&#8221;- Ann Fured<\/em>i<\/p>\n<p>Abortion has historically been a contentious issue on several grounds including moral, ethical, religious and legal. But seldom do we see the women\u2019s right to abortion being debated on grounds of morality. The anti-choice groups frame the ethical debate over abortion in the context of the right to life of the fetus while the pro-choice groups respond with the women\u2019s reproductive rights and bodily autonomy. <\/p>\n<p>Making a remarkable shift Ann Furedi Chief Executive of bpas, sets out the ethical arguments for a woman\u2019s right to choose in her new book: The Moral Case for Abortion. Drawing on sociological thought and moral philosophy, Furedi argues that \u2018there is a strong moral case for recognizing autonomy in personal reproductive decisions, and that supporting a woman\u2019s right to abortion has ethical foundations and integrity\u2019<\/p>\n<p>Furedi argues that to prevent a woman from making her own choice to continue or end her pregnancy is to undermine the essence of her humanity. She asserts that true respect for human life and true regard for individual conscience demand that we respect a woman\u2019s right to decide. <\/p>\n<p>So often, the anti-choice movement gets to monopolize morality. And while there are myriad pragmatic arguments in favour of abortion, Furedi questioned whether this is enough. Instead, she presented the moral case in favour of abortion, arguing that an embryo is not yet \u2018one of us\u2019. Ending life means something different to humans, compared to a being that does not know it\u2019s alive. We have aspirations; we have autonomy to use our minds. That is the real difference.<\/p>\n<p>Furedi recognizes that women would have different views on this matter. But what is not debatable is that women themselves have lives, and the value of those lives does not lessen when they become pregnant. A woman\u2019s value is in her biography, not her biology. A woman\u2019s decisions are her own, and it is women who live with the outcomes of reproductive choices, not the politicians who seek to regulate them.<\/p>\n<p>Fruedi\u2019s arguments draws upon the Kantian imperative that people should not be regarded as a mere means to an end but an end in themselves. She draws upon the principles of bodily autonomy and associated decision making, and stresses that it\u2019s morally reprehensible to deny this capacity for choice\/ decision making to those who are the closest to the consequences. <\/p>\n<p>This thought-provoking book provides a fresh perspective on abortion, which will interest both pro- and anti-choice individuals and organizations, along with academics in the fields of gender studies, philosophy, ethics and religion. <\/p>\n<p>References<br \/>\n1.\thttp:\/\/bpas1968.tumblr.com\/post\/147796326718\/making-the-moral-case-for-abortion#notes<br \/>\n2.\thttp:\/\/www.palgrave.com\/gb\/book\/9781137411181<br \/>\n3.      http:\/\/www.palgrave.com\/gp\/media-centre\/press\/the-moral-case-for-abortion\/10263984<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Access to abortion is an integral part of women\u2019s reproductive health care and women have the ethical right to receive this along with other supportive services&#8221;- Ann Furedi Abortion has historically been a contentious issue on several grounds including moral, ethical, religious and legal. But seldom do we see the women\u2019s right to abortion being&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":4097,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3,431,283],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3571","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-archives","category-book-of-the-month","category-the-pro-choice-debates"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/blog-featured-image-logo.png","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3O7nG-VB","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3571","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3571"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3571\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3576,"href":"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3571\/revisions\/3576"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4097"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3571"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3571"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asap-asia.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3571"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}